As an inventor of systemic decision-making models, I’ve worked with well-meaning leaders, coaches, sellers, and managers who frequently end up with inadequate decisions and difficult implementations.
Too often incomplete information is collected, causing time delays, resistance, or unsatisfactory results. Sometimes faulty assumptions end up misrepresenting important data sets. And far too often, standard decision-making processes consider and weigh options too early in the process.
I’d like to share with you what I think are the initial stages of decision making that often get ignored. By managing these steps it’s possible to achieve successful, timely, accurate outcomes that evade resistance and are maintained over time.
STEPS OF DECISION MAKING
Stage One: Assemble or represent (in large organizations, it could be a representative of a group) those involved with the initiating problem as well as those who will ‘touch’ the ultimate solution. Excluding any of these means
- the originating problem cannot be fully defined;
- ownership, creativity, consensus, and a full set of solution ideas won’t be obtained;
- resistance and failure are possibilities;
- risks won’t be recognized and addressed in a timely way;
- human issues – trust, fear, ego slights – won’t be noticed until too late;
- data gathering, research, weighing, and choice will be limited or unreliable;
- time delays and inefficiencies become probabilities;
- it’s difficult to make an accurate, long term decision that gets maintained.
Rule: A complete data set is needed to define a problem and goal. To do so requires the full representation of people, and an understanding of the systems, involved with the current problem and the final solution.
Stage One concludes with a complete, accurate, stated goal that’s been agreed-upon by all who will use the final output.
Stage Two: The system that underlies the problem/solution must be managed. Questions to be answered:
- Are there existing solutions that can be tried before anything new is considered?
- What has prevented the problem from being resolved until now (current systems, politics, rules, relationships, money, technology)?
- What must be managed to set the stage to do something different and ensure buy-in, ownership, creativity, idea generation, and transparency?
- Are the full set of the risks of change understood and agreed to beforehand?
- What must be managed to remove any obstructions?
- Is the system set up for change? What systems must be in place for the new solution to be created and maintained optimally?
Rule: Because outputs are restricted by the input, before the formal decision making process commences, it’s necessary to manage whatever has kept the problem from being resolved and new systems must be in place to house the new solution.
Stage Two concludes with an understanding of, and plans to resolve, the systems that have maintained the problem with new systems and rules in place to generate and maintain the new solution.
Stage Three: Standard decision-making models and processes take over, including research for solutions assigned, weighing of choices, plans for implementation, etc.
SKILLS FOR STEPS
To accomplish these early-stage decision making steps, you’ll need these skills:
- Self/Observer/Choice. The ability to move between Self (our natural, unconscious, automatic, restricted, biased state) and Observer (our on-the-ceiling, dispassionate, rational, conscious viewing of a broad set of possibilities).
- Rules of trust agreed upon in group.
- Willingness to give up early biases.
- Facilitative Questions™ to ensure data gathered is unbiased.
- Listening without bias. Natural listening involves distortions, deletions, and biases from our brain causing listeners to hear and interpret incoming data uniquely. Extra steps must be taken to verify accuracy.
Too many decision-making processes forget these early steps and end up with flawed data and difficult goal setting, decision weighing, and implementation, not to mention the probability of resistance and struggle maintaining over time. If you would like help ensuring these early steps get done completely, I’d love to coach you and your team through the process. sharondrew@sharondrewmorgen.com
___________________
Sharon-Drew Morgen is a breakthrough innovator and original thinker, having developed new paradigms in sales (inventor Buying Facilitation®, listening/communication (What? Did you really say what I think I heard?), change management (The How of Change™), coaching, and leadership. She is the author of several books, including her new book HOW? Generating new neural circuits for learning, behavior change and decision making, the NYTimes Business Bestseller Selling with Integrity and Dirty Little Secrets: why buyers can’t buy and sellers can’t sell). Sharon-Drew coaches and consults with companies seeking out of the box remedies for congruent, servant-leader-based change in leadership, healthcare, and sales. Her award-winning blog carries original articles with new thinking, weekly. www.sharon-drew.com She can be reached at sharondrew@sharondrewmorgen.com